china's behaviour disgusting
31 Oct 2007 09:37 pmLook who's talking.
=_________________=
Dude.
If I had a stepdaughter that I kicked out of the house, and then a person we both know had a cup of coffee with her, do I have the right to yell "OMGNO U ARE INTERFERING WITH MY FAMILY $#@*)(FWE?!?"
Oh, by the way, who was that disgusting nation whose troops opened fire on unarmed nuns and children about a year ago? Clue: starts with C and ends with A, but definitely ain't pronounced "Canada".
It's gross interference in China's internal affairs.
*Rolls eyes*
And no, Chinese foreign ministry whining and bitching about this meeting isn't interfering with Canada's internal affairs.
God, on the one hand you're WHINING about Canada "interfering" with what happens within your borders...and on the other hand you're WHINING AT Canada doing something within its own borders...WTF?
So, okay, Canada can't talk to someone because that's interfering with you, but you stopping Canada from talking to this person isn't interfering with Canada??
A little bit of logic here??
...Oh, and this is before I even needed to start talking about the Tibetan issue. And about whether or not just a talk taking place even constitutes to "interfering". Ugh.
The argument doesn't stand from the word "go" =___=
=_________________=
Dude.
If I had a stepdaughter that I kicked out of the house, and then a person we both know had a cup of coffee with her, do I have the right to yell "OMGNO U ARE INTERFERING WITH MY FAMILY $#@*)(FWE?!?"
Oh, by the way, who was that disgusting nation whose troops opened fire on unarmed nuns and children about a year ago? Clue: starts with C and ends with A, but definitely ain't pronounced "Canada".
It's gross interference in China's internal affairs.
*Rolls eyes*
And no, Chinese foreign ministry whining and bitching about this meeting isn't interfering with Canada's internal affairs.
God, on the one hand you're WHINING about Canada "interfering" with what happens within your borders...and on the other hand you're WHINING AT Canada doing something within its own borders...WTF?
So, okay, Canada can't talk to someone because that's interfering with you, but you stopping Canada from talking to this person isn't interfering with Canada??
A little bit of logic here??
...Oh, and this is before I even needed to start talking about the Tibetan issue. And about whether or not just a talk taking place even constitutes to "interfering". Ugh.
The argument doesn't stand from the word "go" =___=
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 02:50 pm (UTC)I have a question though, it seems clear that the people of Tibet want independence and freedom from rule under the Chinese government. But what what kind of government do they want in place? A democracy? A theocracy? I don't have a problem with independence, but if it means that if the alternative is the country being put under religious dictatorship, that's not necessarily a good thing either.
But yeah, I simply don't know what the Tibetan people propose to do with their independence and I can't find anything on wiki about it (albeit, after a very quick skim) and I'm wondering if you can fill me in?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-02 03:18 am (UTC)Not too fond of theocracy. Things always go wrong when religions run the country =/ I'm still of the thought that politics has the way of corrupting even the most benign religion.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 05:00 am (UTC)